• Hey Guest,

    As you know, censorship around the world has been ramping up at an alarming pace. The UK and OFCOM has singled out this community and have been focusing its censorship efforts here. It takes a good amount of resources to maintain the infrastructure for our community and to resist this censorship. We would appreciate any and all donations.

    Bitcoin Address (BTC): 39deg9i6Zp1GdrwyKkqZU6rAbsEspvLBJt

    Ethereum (ETH): 0xd799aF8E2e5cEd14cdb344e6D6A9f18011B79BE9

    Monero (XMR): 49tuJbzxwVPUhhDjzz6H222Kh8baKe6rDEsXgE617DVSDD8UKNaXvKNU8dEVRTAFH9Av8gKkn4jDzVGF25snJgNfUfKKNC8

Pluto

Pluto

Meowing to go out
Dec 27, 2020
4,163
It has been said that historically, the most stable societies have been of the one-man-rule variety. The past few centuries have seen much experimentation, yet all seem to be converging back to that same default.

Example: Russia
1721-1917 - Russian Empire: a subjugated population ruled by the Tsar/Emperor.
1922-1991 - USSR: an even more subjugated population ruled by the leader and his State.
1991-present - Russian Federation: a subjugated population ruled by you-know-who and the oligarch/billionaire class.

Example 2: the
United Shursh
pre-1776 - British monarchy colonialism, etc.
1865 - Slavery abolished.
circa-1900 - First billionaires emerge.
post-WWII - unsustainable era of large-scale prosperity.
Present day - billionaire class owns the media and sets the public narrative, government subservient to corporate lobbyists serving the billionaire class, fast-growing disparity between billionaire class and the masses, possible billionaire-led (Trump) movement to terminate democracy outright.

In the wider scale of Egypt or China, where there have been thousands of years worth of relatively stable one-man-rule ranging from ancient dynasties to modern autocrats, the past few centuries seem a mere failed experiment in egalitarianism.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: sserafim and MindFrog