TAW122
Emissary of the right to die.
- Aug 30, 2018
- 6,883
An interesting idea that I had in mind is whenever it comes to many rights, not limited to 2nd amendment (the right to bear arms, firearms, guns, etc. - particularly the US), abortion and women's rights, LGBTQ rights, and such, they all have a commonality when it comes to asserting their right. This is especially true whenever both sides of the debate do not concede, and then when one side decides to abandon constructive, civil dialogue and resort to insults, pettiness, and other unfounded claims. Usually, one of the ways that a conversation that has devolved to incivility and pettiness results in one of them just claiming "because it's our right."
For example, in the US, the 2nd amendment is a contentious issue between liberals and conservatives. I know of this because even in my pre-SaSu days (early 2010's or so), I often lurked around firearm forums and even YT gun content creators that talk about gun laws, legislation, and weapon functionality, so I absorbed a lot of knowledge about different kinds of firearms and ballistics. More importantly, I watched debates between pro-gun and anti-gun folks and therefore, I knew that ultimately, for those who are fervent supporters of the 2nd amendment and gun rights are vocal, and one of their arguments, usually as an absolute, is "because it's our [my] right." Therefore, it is generally said when they either believe that 1) It's no longer productive or constructive to continue debating and want to swiftly end the debate, and/or 2) an absolute statement that acts as an assertion of authority.
So in this article, I have just had an idea that perhaps we, pro-choicers, don't need to justify and try to appease and explain (often to no avail, ending in a stonewall, or worse) our position, especially when it is obvious that pro-lifers, anti-choicers, and preventionists are only looking to patronize, condescend, oppress, and/or bully us. Perhaps we could just use the claim "because it's our right [to bodily autonomy], and shall not be infringed." Of course, for those who are more level-headed and more reasonable, reasoning can be used to explain our position of pro-choice, especially if the opposing side is willing to consider the position, even if at the end they end up still not changing their mind or ultimately agreeing to disagree albeit with well reasoned argument (which means no resorting to gaslighting, incivility, ad hominem attacks, etc.). It is basically about standing up for our rights and taking a stand.
In the end, it would be very hard to reason or apply logic to people with their minds already made up. They are not open to reasoning, explanations, or even dialogue. They just want to push and impose what they believe to be 'correct' (which is subjective in the grand scheme of things and not based on objectivity – at least from the universe's perspective). Therefore, logic and reasoning will not work, but one would fight assertion of authority with assertion of [oneself's] authority. It is not about stooping down to their level, but standing up for our rights, especially our right to ultimate bodily autonomy and the largest, most important decision that a person can make.
For example, in the US, the 2nd amendment is a contentious issue between liberals and conservatives. I know of this because even in my pre-SaSu days (early 2010's or so), I often lurked around firearm forums and even YT gun content creators that talk about gun laws, legislation, and weapon functionality, so I absorbed a lot of knowledge about different kinds of firearms and ballistics. More importantly, I watched debates between pro-gun and anti-gun folks and therefore, I knew that ultimately, for those who are fervent supporters of the 2nd amendment and gun rights are vocal, and one of their arguments, usually as an absolute, is "because it's our [my] right." Therefore, it is generally said when they either believe that 1) It's no longer productive or constructive to continue debating and want to swiftly end the debate, and/or 2) an absolute statement that acts as an assertion of authority.
So in this article, I have just had an idea that perhaps we, pro-choicers, don't need to justify and try to appease and explain (often to no avail, ending in a stonewall, or worse) our position, especially when it is obvious that pro-lifers, anti-choicers, and preventionists are only looking to patronize, condescend, oppress, and/or bully us. Perhaps we could just use the claim "because it's our right [to bodily autonomy], and shall not be infringed." Of course, for those who are more level-headed and more reasonable, reasoning can be used to explain our position of pro-choice, especially if the opposing side is willing to consider the position, even if at the end they end up still not changing their mind or ultimately agreeing to disagree albeit with well reasoned argument (which means no resorting to gaslighting, incivility, ad hominem attacks, etc.). It is basically about standing up for our rights and taking a stand.
In the end, it would be very hard to reason or apply logic to people with their minds already made up. They are not open to reasoning, explanations, or even dialogue. They just want to push and impose what they believe to be 'correct' (which is subjective in the grand scheme of things and not based on objectivity – at least from the universe's perspective). Therefore, logic and reasoning will not work, but one would fight assertion of authority with assertion of [oneself's] authority. It is not about stooping down to their level, but standing up for our rights, especially our right to ultimate bodily autonomy and the largest, most important decision that a person can make.
Last edited: