N
noname223
Archangel
- Aug 18, 2020
- 5,426
The first title for this thread: Do the elites despise the common man? Maybe it is a little bit too populistic this version. I chose a different one.
I have listened to a video of a philosopher who argumented against the notion we lived in a meritocracy.
He said rich people should be more humble a lot of their success stems from the fact they had luck. He quoted people like Obama who said if you try hard enough you will have success eventually. I can remember Macron (french president) said to an unemployed man you just have to look for a job on the street and you will immediately find one. Something similar like that and it sounded very arrogant and pejoratively.
The philosopher argumented Hillary Clinton was arrogant. I can fully agree to that. (My opinion) Some liberals also in my counry (they often write exactly what they read in mainstream media in the US) argument sexism was a huge factor why Clinton lost. I think this is not a fully true. It might have been a small factor. I rather think her attitude towards average Americans made her unpopular. Her famous quote when she called the half of the Trump supporters a "Basket of deplorables" showed her hubris. "They're racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic". For me this contributed a lot to the fact she lost. But also the fact she is a war criminal and violated privacy rules with her e-mail server contributed to her loss.
I think many Trump supporters considered Trump one of them. Because he does not speak like other politicians. But for me most of his policies were gifts for the elites. Like the tax cuts for the mega-wealthy. This thread does not argument that Trump would fight for the common man. I think the opposite is true. But many liberals consider themselves superior (also morally) just because they went to an expensive college and now they enjoy their success because they deserved it so much. I think this philosopher made a very good analysis. Because this bias of the elites is the reason why the populists are rising in popularity. It is a dangerous hubris.
I have listened to a video of a philosopher who argumented against the notion we lived in a meritocracy.
He said rich people should be more humble a lot of their success stems from the fact they had luck. He quoted people like Obama who said if you try hard enough you will have success eventually. I can remember Macron (french president) said to an unemployed man you just have to look for a job on the street and you will immediately find one. Something similar like that and it sounded very arrogant and pejoratively.
The philosopher argumented Hillary Clinton was arrogant. I can fully agree to that. (My opinion) Some liberals also in my counry (they often write exactly what they read in mainstream media in the US) argument sexism was a huge factor why Clinton lost. I think this is not a fully true. It might have been a small factor. I rather think her attitude towards average Americans made her unpopular. Her famous quote when she called the half of the Trump supporters a "Basket of deplorables" showed her hubris. "They're racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic". For me this contributed a lot to the fact she lost. But also the fact she is a war criminal and violated privacy rules with her e-mail server contributed to her loss.
I think many Trump supporters considered Trump one of them. Because he does not speak like other politicians. But for me most of his policies were gifts for the elites. Like the tax cuts for the mega-wealthy. This thread does not argument that Trump would fight for the common man. I think the opposite is true. But many liberals consider themselves superior (also morally) just because they went to an expensive college and now they enjoy their success because they deserved it so much. I think this philosopher made a very good analysis. Because this bias of the elites is the reason why the populists are rising in popularity. It is a dangerous hubris.
Last edited: