• Hey Guest,

    As you know, censorship around the world has been ramping up at an alarming pace. The UK and OFCOM has singled out this community and have been focusing its censorship efforts here. It takes a good amount of resources to maintain the infrastructure for our community and to resist this censorship. We would appreciate any and all donations.

    Bitcoin Address (BTC): 39deg9i6Zp1GdrwyKkqZU6rAbsEspvLBJt

    Ethereum (ETH): 0xd799aF8E2e5cEd14cdb344e6D6A9f18011B79BE9

    Monero (XMR): 49tuJbzxwVPUhhDjzz6H222Kh8baKe6rDEsXgE617DVSDD8UKNaXvKNU8dEVRTAFH9Av8gKkn4jDzVGF25snJgNfUfKKNC8

  • Security update: At around 2:28AM EST, the site was labeled as malicious by Google erroneously, causing users to get a "Dangerous site" warning in most browsers. It appears that this was done by mistake and has been reversed by Google. It may take a few hours for you to stop seeing those warnings.

    If you're still getting these warnings, please let a member of staff know.
carac

carac

Banned
May 27, 2023
1,117
Just listening to Jonathan Haidt. He is arguing that phones started out as something that we used as a tool. It was there that we took out when we needed it for something. He then argues that it turned into something that we are connected to all the time. Companies can use this to notify and advertise to you and so it has gone from something we use to something that uses us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: noname27, marchshift, sserafim and 1 other person
Dr Iron Arc

Dr Iron Arc

Into the Unknown
Feb 10, 2020
21,226
What kinda logic is this? Our phones aren't sentient (yet). Even if the companies are the ones playing us, it doesn't mean the phones themselves are the conductors of the "using us for personal gain" symphony. They are merely the instruments and tools of the trade for the master manipulators.
 
  • Like
  • Aww..
Reactions: sserafim, damyon and xinino
carac

carac

Banned
May 27, 2023
1,117
What kinda logic is this? Our phones aren't sentient (yet). Even if the companies are the ones playing us, it doesn't mean the phones themselves are the conductors of the "using us for personal gain" symphony. They are merely the instruments and tools of the trade for the master manipulators.
Yes I think that's what he means. that the phones are vessels that allow companies to use people for their own ends.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dr Iron Arc, marchshift, sserafim and 1 other person
P

Praestat_Mori

Mori praestat, quam haec pati!
May 21, 2023
11,793
Phones are still the means. We use the phones for what we want/need to do, companies use the phones to collect our precious data and possible send us ads or call us for work ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: sserafim and damyon
xinino

xinino

Anti humanist
Mar 31, 2024
398
We are cyborgs because we need technology to survive also modern men have more abilities and advantages than the primitive ones. Techno-capital is changing the conventional humanity stereotype and has already encompassed different aspects of contemporary life, but the big question is, is it a bad thing?
 
  • Like
Reactions: sserafim
carac

carac

Banned
May 27, 2023
1,117
Also what do people think about these 3 rules for children?

No smart phones until the age of 11
No social media until the age of 16
No phones in school
 
D

damyon

Specialist
Mar 6, 2024
344
Yes I think that's what he means. that the phones are vessels that allow companies to use people for their own ends.
The phone is just a medium.

Just like people used to advertise on the streets by shouting a century ago, it does not mean that the air (sound waves) controls people unless they submit to it.

Also what do people think about these 3 rules for children?
It is like blocking corn for kids. Even if you restrict access to it at home, your kid will still go to your friend's house to watch it.

Redirecting energy towards more productive tasks seems like a better approach.

~~~
"Productive tasks" - the ones that the authority deems useful, hahaha
 
  • Like
Reactions: sserafim
Apathy79

Apathy79

Mage
Oct 13, 2019
512
Also what do people think about these 3 rules for children?

No smart phones until the age of 11
No social media until the age of 16
No phones in school
Social media I think the minimum age is 13? Schools and parents generally are getting better with that, setting accounts to private and only accepting friend/follower requests from people they know. I get why 16 seems more appropriate but the cat's out of the bag on that one.

No smart phones until 11 is a great idea in theory but again difficult practically these days. If all your kid's friends have smart phones, they're not going to understand why they're not allowed.

I assume no phones in class is already the rule most places - and a few already don't allow them in school at all, although they tend to make the news still so are presumably exceptions. Depends if you see between classes as still being particularly harmful?
 
  • Like
Reactions: carac, sserafim and damyon