redkitsune98
Broken beyond repair
- Sep 2, 2024
- 181
Usually the argument for euthanasia and medically assisted suicide is that the people with debilitating physical illnesses and disabilities can get to a point in their lives where they aren't having any quality of life anymore.
But these institutions and laws will argue against euthanasia for people suffering from severe mental issues, depression, etc. because they will state that these problems are solvable and treatable and don't hinder you from living a normal life.
But they do though. What's the difference between someone who can't walk because of broken legs to someone who can't walk because their emotional state is so heavy and burdensome they don't find the motivation or courage to get up and out of bed?
In my opinion, emotional turmoil can be as crippling as some physical issues and should also be given the attention and possibility of free will choice of euthanasia.
But these institutions and laws will argue against euthanasia for people suffering from severe mental issues, depression, etc. because they will state that these problems are solvable and treatable and don't hinder you from living a normal life.
But they do though. What's the difference between someone who can't walk because of broken legs to someone who can't walk because their emotional state is so heavy and burdensome they don't find the motivation or courage to get up and out of bed?
In my opinion, emotional turmoil can be as crippling as some physical issues and should also be given the attention and possibility of free will choice of euthanasia.