Why is there no mention and discussion about firearms in the peaceful pill handbook
Isnt' it one of the more peaceful ways to die
Isnt' it one of the more peaceful ways to die
-
Hey Guest,
As you know, censorship around the world has been ramping up at an alarming pace. The UK and OFCOM has singled out this community and have been focusing its censorship efforts here. It takes a good amount of resources to maintain the infrastructure for our community and to resist this censorship. We would appreciate any and all donations.
Bitcoin Address (BTC): 39deg9i6Zp1GdrwyKkqZU6rAbsEspvLBJt
Ethereum (ETH): 0xd799aF8E2e5cEd14cdb344e6D6A9f18011B79BE9
Monero (XMR): 49tuJbzxwVPUhhDjzz6H222Kh8baKe6rDEsXgE617DVS
DD8UKNaXvKNU8dEVRTAFH9Av8gKkn4jDzVGF25snJgNfUfKKNC8
TAW122
Emissary of the right to die.
- Aug 30, 2018
- 6,888
I think it's probably because the PPeH is mainly focused on fairly peaceful and non-violent methods, therefore firearms (which results in a bloody mess, literally and figuratively speaking) would not be considered. Furthermore, on a practical level, I believe that the PPeH is written in consideration for an international audience, which includes audiences from others countries outside of the US and most countries outside of the US generally have much more restrictive access to legal firearms in terms of procurement, possession, and usage.
Similar threads
Suicide Discussion
NegevChina
