FractalTears
Member
- Feb 4, 2022
- 51
If life becomes "good" again, does it make some people become pro life?
I hope this is the right sub to ask this question.
I hope this is the right sub to ask this question.
As you know, censorship around the world has been ramping up at an alarming pace. The UK and OFCOM has singled out this community and have been focusing its censorship efforts here. It takes a good amount of resources to maintain the infrastructure for our community and to resist this censorship. We would appreciate any and all donations.
Bitcoin Address (BTC): 39deg9i6Zp1GdrwyKkqZU6rAbsEspvLBJt
Ethereum (ETH): 0xd799aF8E2e5cEd14cdb344e6D6A9f18011B79BE9
Monero (XMR): 49tuJbzxwVPUhhDjzz6H222Kh8baKe6rDEsXgE617DVS
If life becomes "good" again, does it make some people become pro life?
Anti-choice is a better term than pro-life. I think that the vast majority of SS members in recovery don't become anti-choice.
"despicable duo of NYT" lol it was actually thanks to that article that I discovered this site. How do people not realize that the #1 way to get someone to resent something, including life, is to make them feel like they have no choice in the matter?"Pro-life" is a term used by the anti-choice horde to make themselves feel good, and they also deliberately use the term "pro-suicide" to make us look like evil monsters.
The right to life includes the right to lead a life without extreme pain & suffering and the right to have a peaceful & dignified death, both of which the fanatical anti-choice horde are completely opposed to! So they are not "pro-life" by any meaningful definition of the term.
Coming to the question, I don't believe pro-choicers automatically become anti-choice even if they recover from their mental or physical illnesses. Sure, they may not be suicidal any longer, but they're quite unlikely to join the rabid anti-choice brigade. At the most, they may develop a neutral attitude towards CTB.
Yes, I've heard of quite a few who were on the verge of CTB but didn't go through for whatever reason coming out with their past struggles. They become advocates for better mental health care or start organisations to reduce suicides, but their position on CTB can't quite be described as anti-choice (like that of the despicable duo of NYT). I would say such persons feel that there is a chance of recovery for at least some who are contemplating CTB and want to give them that chance.
Imagine, just imagine someone trying to be an evil monster towards the suicidal. It disgusts me. You're so right "pro-suicide" is what they say to make us seem delusional."Pro-life" is a term used by the anti-choice horde to make themselves feel good, and they also deliberately use the term "pro-suicide" to make us look like evil monsters.
The right to life includes the right to lead a life without extreme pain & suffering and the right to have a peaceful & dignified death, both of which the fanatical anti-choice horde are completely opposed to! So they are not "pro-life" by any meaningful definition of the term.
Coming to the question, I don't believe pro-choicers automatically become anti-choice even if they recover from their mental or physical illnesses. Sure, they may not be suicidal any longer, but they're quite unlikely to join the rabid anti-choice brigade. At the most, they may develop a neutral attitude towards CTB.
Yes, I've heard of quite a few who were on the verge of CTB but didn't go through for whatever reason coming out with their past struggles. They become advocates for better mental health care or start organisations to reduce suicides, but their position on CTB can't quite be described as anti-choice (like that of the despicable duo of NYT). I would say such persons feel that there is a chance of recovery for at least some who are contemplating CTB and want to give them that chance.
Of course, this is obvious.If life becomes "good" again, does it make some people become pro life?
I hope this is the right sub to ask this question.