lol thanks to that procedure I just confirmed Eviscerated Jester. I used my deductive reasoning when she told me she does not like me and therefore could never have a cordial conversation with me. It's a shame because I like interactions with people I disagree with, but I refused to bow to the 1st year psychology indoctrination and wanted to have an actual discussion. I can say that now, right, because she won't see it? I haven't ignored anyone. Does she also never see when I like her posts?
That's great, I need to go change my vote in the "topics you won't discuss" thread if I can be sure she won't swoop in to call me a racist for believing race exists. (which I still wonder how one can be X-ist if X is not real, but now I'll never get my answer.)
Firstly, you should thank
@sserafim, not me, as she was the one who came up with that theory. Secondly, I knew that EJ ignored me as well before I even knew about
@sserafim's theory but this just went to show that her theory is most likely true. Thirdly, people who ignored you can still see your posts as an ignore isn't the same as a block. From her perspective, you posts will just be hidden saying something like "this is ignored content from a user, tap here to view ignored content" (of course it doesn't say that verbatim but the effects to what it says are similar). EJ has randomly replied to one of my posts despite her putting me on ignore.
She could still reply to you if she wanted to but she most likely wouldn't. Who knows, I never thought that she'd reply to me yet she did so the same could happen for you. Oh, also, I have no idea if she can see you liking her posts or not
Edit: I just realised that you were thanking the method itself rather than the person behind the method but, regardless, I think that
@sserafim still deserves her thanks as I have no idea how we were meant to figure this out normally. I'm now wondering if this is a feature of SaSu or an unintended side effect