TAW122
Emissary of the right to die.
- Aug 30, 2018
- 6,883
It is no surprise and no secret that all of us despise and detest such banal and infamous CTB prevention slogans such as [it is a] "Permanent solution to temporary problems." and suppose we change one or two words of that slogan, to something like "Permanent solution to temporary [all] problems." then the meaning would drastically change. What do you think would happen if one were to change such statements? Do you think that would change the whole meaning of the statement in a way? What kind of reactions do you think people will have to such things?
I have thought about if someone were to push for the RTD, perhaps the emphasis on solution to ALL problems of the living and more, perhaps that would yield even more effect or something, maybe it might detract from the infamous slogan that pro-lifers have, but maybe I could be wrong? In my eyes, I think that by changing one word (or two), this greatly alters the meaning of the phrase and tone of it. For some people, perhaps they want to have a permanent solution to ALL [life and sentience's] problems, and that isn't necessarily a bad thing. It is only negative in the eyes of pro-lifers because they take an unqualifiable value on life that is faith-based and not based on concrete objectivity, but I digress.
Anyways, I hope people managed to find this idea kind of interesting and in case anyone is wondering, no I don't plan on infiltrating pro-life organizations (maybe someone else might though but not me) and changing their messages and slogans, kind of turning it on it's head. What do you think will happen with such changes?
I have thought about if someone were to push for the RTD, perhaps the emphasis on solution to ALL problems of the living and more, perhaps that would yield even more effect or something, maybe it might detract from the infamous slogan that pro-lifers have, but maybe I could be wrong? In my eyes, I think that by changing one word (or two), this greatly alters the meaning of the phrase and tone of it. For some people, perhaps they want to have a permanent solution to ALL [life and sentience's] problems, and that isn't necessarily a bad thing. It is only negative in the eyes of pro-lifers because they take an unqualifiable value on life that is faith-based and not based on concrete objectivity, but I digress.
Anyways, I hope people managed to find this idea kind of interesting and in case anyone is wondering, no I don't plan on infiltrating pro-life organizations (maybe someone else might though but not me) and changing their messages and slogans, kind of turning it on it's head. What do you think will happen with such changes?