I think it's trickier than that. It's hard to imagine someone deriliously happy committing suicide. But, how about this: Someone goes through an extremely rough patch where things get so bad, they consider suicide. Maybe they would be diagnosed with depression, maybe not. Regardless though- let's say in this case, they somehow recover. To the point where they are reasonable happy or, at least more at peace with living. Does that mean their ideation vanishes entirely? Perhaps not. It may linger on as an idea- an option they still feel open to. They may fear things sliding back down again. They may simply feel that life is reasonable now but, perhaps still not entirely worth all the effort they are putting in. So- are they actually still 'depressed' or, are they logically thinking- I'm not willing to go through that shit again and, perhaps life in general isn't worth the upkeep?
It's up to the psychologists to figure out whether depression is an actual illness and who actually has it. Whether it changes our brains- perhaps permanently. I truly wish they'd get a wiggle on! The diagnosis for mental illnesses seem way too whoolly to me.
In the past, I've been diagnosed with mild to moderate depression. I've had ideation for 35 years though- since I was 10. Can someone even be depressed for that long? I'm reasonably high functioning too. I can hold a job, look after myself etc. I've been happier than I am now and, a whole lot sadder. Ideation has followed throughout all of it.
I wonder if ideation is in fact a whole other 'illness'. I feel as if it's like that line from The Matrix: 'A splinter in your mind'. Once it's there, I wonder if it ever really shifts.
Truthfully, it pisses me off, them always linking ideation with mental illness. Plus, linking mental illness with mental incompetency. It's not that I'm entirely oppossed to a diagnosis or, that I believe it's impossible for a mental illness to affect competency. However, I think it's far more nuanced than that.
More than that though, it's that many of us are still expected to work! Make decisions regarding our and other's lives. I suspect the moment we start talking about ideation openly though, our mental competency would be questioned. If we're truly mentally incompetent then, surely- we deserve to be on benefits. Why expect us to work if we're that unstable? How many depressed police officers, transport drivers, surgeons are there? People directly responsible for other people surviving (or not.)
I don't think those in power should be able to have their cake and eat it- as it were. Either we're a bunch of crazy people who are too mentally incompetent to be able to work- Why trust us with responsibility at all? Maybe we do have ideation and/ or mental illness. Doesn't mean we're necessarily not capable of rational thought though. In which case- we can demonstrate the ability to work and make decisions for ourselves- which should include the decision to die.
The other issue is- Whether ideation stems from mental illness or not, if they can't reliably cure it, it's a problem. If they can't even provide people with a reasonable quality of life then- their definitions seem less important. This person is suffering. You can't seem to ease that for them so- now what? You just leave them suffering? Great.
It's so weird when it comes to animal euthanasia. We don't understand their language to even know whether they are suffering enough to want to die. Yet, we make the decision for them. Are we really so distrustful of our fellow human beings that when they beg and plead and insist that their lives are that painful- What? We don't believe them? It's weird. Like- it's the 'crazy' making you 'think' that. Well ok- fix the 'crazy' then. Oh, we can't.