Darkover
Angelic
- Jul 29, 2021
- 4,797
Prisoners have no freedom of choice, and no freedom at all outside of the few meager choices they are allowed in prison, and even those are revoked for those in solitary confinement. They are not free at all but they are slaves to the government
prisoners, especially those in solitary confinement, experience a complete loss of freedom. Their autonomy is stripped away, and they are left with very limited choices, if any. In many ways, the system of incarceration does mirror slavery, as prisoners are subjected to the will of the state and lose control over their lives.
The comparison between prison and slavery is not without merit. Slavery historically involved not just forced labor, but the total control of one person's life by another. In prison, the government or the state exercises a similar level of control, deciding where prisoners live, what they eat, how they work (if they are allowed to), and even limiting their access to human contact or sunlight. Some scholars and activists argue that this level of control and exploitation, particularly in systems where prisoners are forced to work for little or no pay, does indeed resemble modern slavery.
Prison reform advocates have long critiqued the way many prison systems function, especially in the context of mass incarceration and racial disparities, which can feel like systemic oppression.
Yes, taking away someone's freedom of choice can be considered a form of controlling domination. When someone is deprived of their ability to make decisions or direct their own life, they are subject to the will or control of another party. This form of domination involves imposing one's authority over another, restricting autonomy, and limiting the individual's ability to exercise their own preferences or desires.
Many people believe that individuals should have autonomy over their own lives, including the right to choose when and how to end them, particularly in cases of terminal illness, chronic suffering, or extreme mental distress. However, most governments impose restrictions on assisted suicide and euthanasia, citing concerns about ethics, potential abuse, and societal values.
We are absolutely NOT free
you think your free no your just a slave to the government in the name of national security
at moment war could break out and you would be conscripted
governments can impose conscription or mandatory military service during times of war, effectively taking away individual choice about whether or not to participate. Conscription, or being drafted into military service, is one of the clearest examples of how personal freedom can be overridden by the state in the name of national security. In such cases, people are often forced to fight, sometimes even against their will, under the threat of punishment if they refuse.
prisoners, especially those in solitary confinement, experience a complete loss of freedom. Their autonomy is stripped away, and they are left with very limited choices, if any. In many ways, the system of incarceration does mirror slavery, as prisoners are subjected to the will of the state and lose control over their lives.
The comparison between prison and slavery is not without merit. Slavery historically involved not just forced labor, but the total control of one person's life by another. In prison, the government or the state exercises a similar level of control, deciding where prisoners live, what they eat, how they work (if they are allowed to), and even limiting their access to human contact or sunlight. Some scholars and activists argue that this level of control and exploitation, particularly in systems where prisoners are forced to work for little or no pay, does indeed resemble modern slavery.
Prison reform advocates have long critiqued the way many prison systems function, especially in the context of mass incarceration and racial disparities, which can feel like systemic oppression.
Yes, taking away someone's freedom of choice can be considered a form of controlling domination. When someone is deprived of their ability to make decisions or direct their own life, they are subject to the will or control of another party. This form of domination involves imposing one's authority over another, restricting autonomy, and limiting the individual's ability to exercise their own preferences or desires.
Many people believe that individuals should have autonomy over their own lives, including the right to choose when and how to end them, particularly in cases of terminal illness, chronic suffering, or extreme mental distress. However, most governments impose restrictions on assisted suicide and euthanasia, citing concerns about ethics, potential abuse, and societal values.
We are absolutely NOT free
you think your free no your just a slave to the government in the name of national security
at moment war could break out and you would be conscripted
governments can impose conscription or mandatory military service during times of war, effectively taking away individual choice about whether or not to participate. Conscription, or being drafted into military service, is one of the clearest examples of how personal freedom can be overridden by the state in the name of national security. In such cases, people are often forced to fight, sometimes even against their will, under the threat of punishment if they refuse.