• Hey Guest,

    As you know, censorship around the world has been ramping up at an alarming pace. The UK and OFCOM has singled out this community and have been focusing its censorship efforts here. It takes a good amount of resources to maintain the infrastructure for our community and to resist this censorship. We would appreciate any and all donations.

    Bitcoin Address (BTC): 39deg9i6Zp1GdrwyKkqZU6rAbsEspvLBJt

    Ethereum (ETH): 0xd799aF8E2e5cEd14cdb344e6D6A9f18011B79BE9

    Monero (XMR): 49tuJbzxwVPUhhDjzz6H222Kh8baKe6rDEsXgE617DVSDD8UKNaXvKNU8dEVRTAFH9Av8gKkn4jDzVGF25snJgNfUfKKNC8

D

Doctors HATE them

She/they
Nov 16, 2022
91
I believe that happiness is the only good and unhappiness is the only bad. For example, if someone likes learning, it's not the learning itself that's good, it's just that learning created happiness and happiness is good.
Life (and even stuff that aren't alive like viruses) wants to perpetuate itself. Organisms adapt to the environment to do what is most effective for survival. It's like how in AI there's positive and negative feedback; survival and reproduction are positive and death is negative. Survival, reproduction, and death, despite being used to determine what exists, have no intrinsic value because they themselves cannot be felt. What is felt are feelings (pain, anger, happiness, sadness, hunger, etc.) and these feelings are assigned by the bodies of living things to happen when a stimulus occurs. For example, if an animal is injured, it feels pain. The injury is not what is bad, the pain is what is bad because feelings (and thoughts) are the only things that are experienced.
Unhappiness comes in several forms such as pain and sadness; it is biologically wired to be negative. All animals capable of feeling unhappiness use it as a source of negativity. Sometimes it's to avoid predators, other times it's to stop the organism feeling it from performing behaviors that would make it less likely to live.
The same is true for happiness, which also comes in several forms like euphoria and satisfaction. It is used to illicit behaviors that are likely to lead to survival or reproduction.
Thoughts are unique because, despite being experienced, they are not felt and therefore have no value.
Happiness is good because biology defines it as such. Unhappiness is bad because biology defines it as such. If it was theoretically possible to change biology, there could be multiple goods and/or multiple bads but until that happens, this is how it is.

This is all to say that I believe happiness should be maximized and unhappiness should be minimized.

I was gonna write something else, but I spent so much time typing all this background info that completely forgot what my original intention with this post was. I'll update later if I remember.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rationaltake
D

Doctors HATE them

She/they
Nov 16, 2022
91
After typing this all out and thinking about it, I can say that anti-natalism doesn't make sense to me. I sympathize with the cause because I wanna avoid pain, but there are so many people that ARE happy. So many that eugenics, efilism, anti-natalism, and similar philosophies don't seem logical. Instead, I think that having suicide as an available option for everyone at all times is the best. Who are others to say who are and aren't happy? Just leave it to the individual to decide.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rationaltake

Similar threads

gnarly
Replies
2
Views
90
Offtopic
casual_existence
casual_existence
I
Replies
0
Views
76
Suicide Discussion
imsickandtired.
I
toxicjester
Replies
7
Views
299
Suicide Discussion
toxicjester
toxicjester
HeartThatFeeds
Replies
1
Views
250
Suicide Discussion
JustSomeWeirdo
JustSomeWeirdo
Dr Iron Arc
Replies
11
Views
485
Offtopic
casual_existence
casual_existence