L'absent
À ma manière 🪦
- Aug 18, 2024
- 974
This is a question that, in my opinion, should make us reflect: what happens when someone no longer finds a reason to live? If, as it seems, life has no universal meaning and everyone gives it whatever value they want, then why should we insist on keeping it alive? If someone no longer sees any meaning in anything, does it really make sense to keep pushing them to "fight" to stay alive? In our world, we seem to believe that life should always be protected, as if it had absolute value. But if that value no longer exists for a person, should we force them to stay alive at all costs? Wouldn't it be more respectful to honor their decision, without judgment? I know, talking about suicide is difficult and scary for pro-lifers, but if someone gets to the point of no longer wanting to live, perhaps we need to moralize less and ask ourselves what is really right for them and not for us.I know many pro-lifers will say that "life is always precious" and that we need to help people in crisis. But do all people really want help when they're at that point? Do all people feel this sacredness within themselves? And if someone thinks it's not worth moving forward, shouldn't we let them choose their own destiny? Society says we have to do everything we can to keep them alive, but aren't we doing more harm by persisting? It's hard, I know, but in my opinion it's a reflection we need to make: to what extent is respect for life really "respect" if we don't respect the choices of others? Ultimately, if someone no longer wants to be here, isn't it more respectful to let them go, rather than forcing them to live in a world they no longer want to see?