An update on the OFCOM situation: As you know, censorship around the world has been ramping up at an alarming pace. OFCOM, the UK’s communications regulator, has singled out our community, demanding compliance with their Online Safety Act despite our minimal UK presence. This is a blatant overreach, and they have been sending letters pressuring us to comply with their censorship agenda.
Our platform is already blocked by many UK ISPs, yet they continue their attempts to stifle free speech. Standing up to this kind of regulatory overreach requires lots of resources to maintain our infrastructure and fight back against these unjust demands. If you value our community and want to support us during this time, we would greatly appreciate any and all donations.
I don't think the ignore list has a limit, so keep proving to everyone you are exactly what I said you are. Every wad you blow burns another account. Press of a button and you are gone.
Tfw you enter a thread specifically to pick a fight, embarrass yourself when stood up to and resort to pathetic bleating about how nasty other people are to you whilst still trying to maintain a facade of affected nonchalance.
I was reading the N megathread and was surprised to see so many people still had their N. If I order it and it comes, I would be drinking it the very first day.
You got a belt? Why haven't you hanged yourself yet? Are you some kind of wuss? Man, if l had me a goddam BOOTLACE I'd have hanged myself off of this goddam light fitting right now, l wouldn't be sitting here typing like a pussy. In fact, if l just had me a tall building, I'd jump off of it right now. Straight away. I wouldn't give a fuck. I'd fucking love that shit.
So.....anybody want to play Hearts or talk about cute little kittens.
Listen, this debate will never end. The SI in everyone is either strong or ridiculously tough for some. I can assure you if I had N, or rope around my neck, or breathing in N2, etc. it is going to take a Herculean effort to subdue the SI urges no matter my mental or physical state. Everyone of us is going to have to build a tremendous amount of will power and mental strength to say, " Oh fuck it " and execute the deal. If it was so damn easy, I wouldn't typing this shit right now. You guys would be saying either ReadyasEver was a nice guy and I hope he's in peace or I'm sure glad that bastard is out of here
Reactions:
Jenna, ctrl_alt_delete, Smilla and 4 others
That's what makes me more hopeless than ever. Knowing now that I have nowhere near the strength I had in my younger days to work up the nerve to get this done.
I was close when I was 20. Had the gun. Had everything going against me. Still, it was such an anxiety riddled event that it just wore me out and I never went through with it. Now I feel pressure to do it, but can't even begin to work up to it. It's like a distant dream like some people with the lottery. I'd take being able to complete this over winning the lottery.
Reactions:
ctrl_alt_delete, Deleted member 4993 and RaphtaliaTwoAnimals
A gives the shelf life, as per him being a vet, basically. And as far as "nobody" being willing to definitively state etc etc, dude, go ask a junior chemistry student about stable compounds. You're fear mongering here. Like the nonsense about A being a known scammer and liar in other threads. Why are you doing this?
A "could" is not the same as "will be definitely".
Generalized statements are useless as posted in the other thread. I understand you want to cling to hope. Maybe you bought it years ago. Still not more than conjecture.
Of course, one method is more comfortable, more appealing, less terrifying than another; that's a judgement call for each individual. The courage required to bring about one's own ceasing to exist is the same however, regardless of method.
The OP is suggesting he'd ctb right now if only he had N. I'd counter that by saying if the need to ctb was so urgent and unrelenting, he'd manage just fine without it.
That's incredibly offensive and in the same vein as the "if they'd really wanted to do it they'd have done it already".
Methods differ greatly in possible outcomes. Since N is being treated as the holy grail it's only logical to wait before ending up trapped inside a broken body like this poor individual due to impulsive action.
It's not anyone's business to judge other's lists of acceptable methods.
Reactions:
ctrl_alt_delete, GlowingCactus, waived and 1 other person
A "could" is not the same as "will be definitely".
Generalized statements are useless as posted in the other thread. I understand you want to cling to hope. Maybe you bought it years ago. Still not more than conjecture.
Sorry but that's simply not true. A said you can store it in a drawer. It doesn't need to be in a fridge. He said it's recommended to keep it in a fridge once you opened it. He also said it's recommended to use it until the expiration date. Please don't share misinformation.
Reactions:
Jenna, J.E. Morrow, ctrl_alt_delete and 2 others
Sorry but that's simply not true. A said you can store it in a drawer. It doesn't need to be in a fridge. He said it's recommended to keep it in a fridge once you opened it. He also said it's recommended to use it until the expiration date. Please don't share misinformation.
If you keep the bottle sealed you can store it in a drawer. If its opened the recommendation is to put it in the fridge between 3º to 5º Celsius and I recommend its use until the indicated expiration date. The product does not lose power from one day to another, takes months until is completely wasted, so if you store the product in the fridge (if its opened) or in your drawer (if remains closed) it is useful at least until the expiration date.
Can you stop spreading lies now?
Reactions:
J.E. Morrow, RaphtaliaTwoAnimals, Chinaski and 2 others
A "could" is not the same as "will be definitely".
Generalized statements are useless as posted in the other thread. I understand you want to cling to hope. Maybe you bought it years ago. Still not more than conjecture.
As I said in the other thread, this is nonsense. I am not one to "cling to hope" if you have read and been able to follow the type of posts I make here.
I seem to recall, I think, you insisting that A was a scammer and a liar. Ah, yes, here are your words:
creationisdeath said:
A success rate of below 50% and a dealer that is provably a liar warrants "fear mongering".
Seriously, you're confused, irrational, inconsistent and misinformed. You're fear mongering, and you are hectoring and bullying people. This is just not helpful
Again, as I suggested before, read some genuine scientific articles on the subject. I suggested how you could find them, but I don't feel inclined to spoon feed you.
Last edited:
Reactions:
Johnnythefox, RainAndSadness, Chinaski and 1 other person
I guess it is if you deliberately wish to decide you're going to pretend to take it that way for entirely performative reasons. The actual opening post could be accurately described as more "offensive" than the one of mine you've quoted, for the same reasons, as you know.
I guess it is if you deliberately wish to decide you're going to pretend to take it that way for entirely performative reasons. The actual opening post could be accurately described as more "offensive" than the one of mine you've quoted, for the same reasons, as you know.
This is not a contest about which post is less offensive. The fact that people make offensive posts does not give anyone the right to make offensive posts back. That's just spreading the hate. Just my opinion.
Reactions:
Dead Meat, RaphtaliaTwoAnimals, Deleted member 4993 and 4 others
This is not a contest about which post is less offensive. The fact that people make offensive posts does not give anyone the right to make offensive posts back. That's just spreading the hate. Just my opinion.
No, but it's becoming something of a coincidence when the noble white-knights emerge, fresh from posting duff scam-adjacent nonsense, to take a very dramatic and excessive degree of hand-wringing umbrage at my posts and no others, which are clearly more offensive and, in this case, literally opened the thread.
In this case it's what one might consider "selective", and also "bullshit".
This is not a contest about which post is less offensive. The fact that people make offensive posts does not give anyone the right to make offensive posts back. That's just spreading the hate. Just my opinion.
I understand your point, but really, you can't reason with a rude and ill informed bully. All that does is encourage them. Sometimes they need to be put in their place firmly. If no-one stands up to them, they are empowered to attack other people, and this could be very damaging to the more vulnerable people here.
There are no "contests" that I see happening here, with respect. I see a serial bully being very firmly dealt with, with language that he can understand.
well, if the other thread was anything to go by anything from a chicken's cluck and beyond is far too complicated and tedious for you to respond to coherently.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.