• ⚠️ UK Access Block Notice: Beginning July 1, 2025, this site will no longer be accessible from the United Kingdom. This is a voluntary decision made by the site's administrators. We were not forced or ordered to implement this block.

knivesandcuddles

knivesandcuddles

Member
May 7, 2025
29
This year, I've personally lost two beings who were very close to me, via sodium nitrite. @spark, a very close friend of mine, died 2025-06-26. @shroomia, my girlfriend (and more practically speaking, my wife) died 2025-10-10.

I'm starting this thread partly to share my anecdotes about their SN deaths + hypoxia in general, but also to discuss possible inaccuracies many might assume about SN as a suicide method. I think it's important that we understand what we're getting into, and whether we can expect peacefulness, since that's what many on here are hoping for.



spark:
spark (it/its pronouns, 19 years old) died by SN on June 26, 2025. spark didn't have any of the other drugs that are typically recommended with an SN regiment: anti-emetics, benzodiazepines, beta-blockers...

No, spark "rawdogged" it with nothing but weed. spark asked shroomia to call with it so it wouldn't have to be alone when it died. According to accounts of shroomia, both on SaSu and more privately in person between the two of us, spark's death was unfortunately...rather painful. spark complained of the nausea and pain to shroomia, even waking back up after losing consciousness, and continuing to be in pain.

In the end, the SN worked, and it took perhaps ~1 hour at most, though shroomia didn't keep track of it. spark...reached out to shroomia while she was at work. shroomia took that call while she was at work from a bathroom stall...



shroomia:
shroomia (she/her or it/its pronouns, 24 years old) died by SN on October 10, 2025. shroomia did have all of the drugs that are recommended for an SN regiment.

I painstakingly took notes of what she told me that night, and you can read the minute-to-minute details in her SaSu thread. However, shroomia too experienced pain while dying from SN. She took her SN around 01:10, and was already unresponsive by 01:22, just 12 minutes later. In the January 2025 PPeH (page 122 of 225), Exit International discusses that 12 minutes is actually rather typical for losing consciousness:
1760200800046
The things I heard on call with my girlfriend are more or less exactly what is reported. This is the good news. SN works. Period.

However, it leaves open a rather unsettling fact: SN is quite unforgiving as a method of suicide. shroomia had already taken several tablets of benzos as well as an anti-emetic prior to the SN at 01:10, and yet...she told me about her stomach hurting, and I could hear things like vomiting over the call.



spark and I:
spark and I attempted to CTB with carbon monoxide (CO) on 2025-05-14 (May 14, 2025). That attempt didn't work out, and the both of us suffered symptoms of hypoxia because we both survived.

For me, because I didn't have any sedatives when we brought our burning coals into the room, I ended up waking up after initially losing consciousness. I was in immense pain. I had a headache, severe nausea, and I could barely stand. I left the room and made it to the bathroom, where I found my underwear was already wet from urine, and I also had to clean up quite a bit of feces that had already left my body while I was unconscious. I later learned that all of my remaining headmates had died in that attempt. The brain damage was already that bad.

In the days and weeks that followed, the headache remained for several days. I also developed a cough with flu-like symptoms, which is apparently also common of hypoxia induced by CO poisoning. Those flu-like symptoms stayed around for 1-2 weeks.

In the PPeH (page 175 of 225), Exit International reports their findings of CO deaths:
1760202007311
The time that passed between starting our CO attempt and ending it was anywhere between 30 minutes to 2 hours. We didn't keep track very well. I was in a lot of pain, after all. However, with the symptoms I had, I find it surprising that either of us survived at all. It leaves me questioning what went wrong - if we didn't stay in the room long enough, or if the CO concentration dropped too rapidly because of spark spreading out the coals onto grilling trays for surface area, or if the table from the PPeH is misleading and inaccurate.



On the Peacefulness of Nitrites:
Since both CO and SN are known to induce hypoxia (and likely also potassium nitrite - KNO2, aka KN), I've reached some personal beliefs about these methods that I hope can help inform others about the consequences.

Hypoxia sucks. I've lived it. And both spark and shroomia died in discomfort (and yes, even pain) from it. There are some good and bad takeaways from this that we should disillusion ourselves of...

The good:
  • SN works. Period.
  • SN gives a relatively fast death, and leads to rapid unconsciousness.
The neutral:
  • SN requires a fair bit of other drugs to ensure that it's a peaceful way of dying at all.
  • Some of those drugs can be several times more expensive than the SN itself.
  • In several countries, first responders are increasingly carrying around the antidote to SN, "methylene blue." (Source: PPeH, page 120 of 225)
The bad:
  • SN is so rapid that it has become clear to me that the timing of other prior drugs is crucial to the peacefulness of the method.
  • Without already being in a state of heavy drowsiness, the onset of hypoxia symptoms can also be just as rapid and it might lead to an uncomfortable or even painful death.
Worthy of noting (and possible exceptions):
  • Both spark and shroomia were relatively young when they died. Age and other physical traits can always play a role in what our own bodies experience.



Lastly, all of this isn't to try to scare people away from SN. Rather, if SN is part of your plan, please consider when you take your supplementary drugs. SN is fast. If the other drugs aren't already kicking in, the SN might be quicker, and such a death might end up more painful than most would anticipate.

If you're not already familiar with the resource, you should look into the Psychonaut Wiki. It's a wiki of information on drugs and their effects. While most of it is recreational-use information, the site also documents what to expect from benzodiazepines, such as alprazolam (aka Xanax), and when the effects peak.

That's all. Thanks for reading.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Hugs
Reactions: lovelydove, sanction, gottacheckout and 10 others
Hypocrite_

Hypocrite_

Self-conflicted
Aug 10, 2022
22
Thank you for documenting it all in this thread. May I ask what kind of pain were you alluding to with the SN other than the stomachache and vomiting? Did they ever communicated it with you?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: knivesandcuddles
MyShadow

MyShadow

Torn between fixing and ending my life
Aug 27, 2025
421
Thank you for the detailed accounts and information and I am deeply saddened by your loss.
 
  • Hugs
Reactions: knivesandcuddles
knivesandcuddles

knivesandcuddles

Member
May 7, 2025
29
May I ask what kind of pain were you alluding to with the SN other than the stomachache and vomiting? Did they ever communicated it with you?
Hi, I linked shroomia's thread in the post. I chose to refrain from heavy specifics, both to honor the privacy of those threads being posted on the private section of the forum, and also to reduce redundancy. I suspect that your answers are already answered in the minute-to-minute write-up I wrote in shroomia's thread. I likely don't have any more information for you that isn't already there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hypocrite_
unluckysadness

unluckysadness

Warlock
Jul 9, 2025
704
Many thanks for sharing this. It's very informative. And really sorry for your loss. It's so sad.
SN is my method. Would you recommend to take benzos 10 minutes BEFORE taking SN ? Because the PPH recommends taking benzos just after SN (and it doesn't makes sense to me). This question has already been discussed here but I'm waiting for the next PPH update.
 
knivesandcuddles

knivesandcuddles

Member
May 7, 2025
29
Would you recommend to take benzos 10 minutes BEFORE taking SN ? Because the PPH recommends taking benzos just after SN (and it doesn't makes sense to me).
It's a good question. shroomia and I discussed that while planning our attempt on the 7th, a few days ago.

You should note that the PPeH (also page 122) recommends crushing up the benzos (with their recommendation being oxazepam) and drinking it with water. Their recommendation of oxazepam in particular is likely because it's a fast-acting benzo, and the act of crushing it up beforehand likely also increases how quickly the body uptakes it (though this is largely a guess on my part, and I haven't looked for any sources backing that up).

I personally prefer alprazolam/xanax since it's fast-acting too, more commonly prescribed (as far as I know), and therefore easier to obtain. On Wikipedia, they also note that propanolol (the recommended beta blocker) has no adverse reactions when combined with either oxazepam nor alprazolam, but does with some other types of benzos. According to the Psychonaut Wiki that I linked, alprazolam can take up to 2 hours before peaking in intensity. If it's worth it to you, you might consider playing around with that prior to an attempt to understand your own body's reaction to the amount you take.

That being said...I prefer simply taking it orally, as per usual with benzos. It also means less work to be done while possibly already in a drowsy state, which could lead to mistakes. It means you might have to do some math in regards to your own body to figure out when is the comfiest time to take your benzos, so as to brace for the onset of SN symptoms.
 
unluckysadness

unluckysadness

Warlock
Jul 9, 2025
704
It's a good question. shroomia and I discussed that while planning our attempt on the 7th, a few days ago.

You should note that the PPeH (also page 122) recommends crushing up the benzos (with their recommendation being oxazepam) and drinking it with water. Their recommendation of oxazepam in particular is likely because it's a fast-acting benzo, and the act of crushing it up beforehand likely also increases how quickly the body uptakes it (though this is largely a guess on my part, and I haven't looked for any sources backing that up).

I personally prefer alprazolam/xanax since it's fast-acting too, more commonly prescribed (as far as I know), and therefore easier to obtain. On Wikipedia, they also note that propanolol (the recommended beta blocker) has no adverse reactions when combined with either oxazepam nor alprazolam, but does with some other types of benzos. According to the Psychonaut Wiki that I linked, alprazolam can take up to 2 hours before peaking in intensity. If it's worth it to you, you might consider playing around with that prior to an attempt to understand your own body's reaction to the amount you take.

That being said...I prefer simply taking it orally, as per usual with benzos. It also means less work to be done while possibly already in a drowsy state, which could lead to mistakes. It means you might have to do some math in regards to your own body to figure out when is the comfiest time to take your benzos, so as to brace for the onset of SN symptoms.
Thanks ! I have a lot of valium pills for my muscle spasms and my severe anxiety. I take 5mg daily and it makes me drowsy after 30 minutes. I asked AI and the equivalent dose vs oxazepam would be 300mg, so if 5mg makes me drowsy, 300mg should kick me very fast. I should try to increase the dose to see how my body reacts, but I'm afraid with side effects and I don't want to end at the hospital. I'm pretty sure that next version of PPH will bring some improvement with SN method.
 
knivesandcuddles

knivesandcuddles

Member
May 7, 2025
29
I asked AI
I'm sorry, but you're looking in the wrong places. Your answer is already incorrect. LLMs are nothing but statistical models that predict the next word in a sentence. They are not intelligent, and you should never trust any answer they write you. Please. Please listen to me - I have a Master degree in Computer Science and I specialized in this field. LLM-based AIs are not your friend. Please. I beg you.

I have a lot of valium pills for my muscle spasms and my severe anxiety. I take 5mg daily and it makes me drowsy after 30 minutes.
Valium (diazepam) is a reasonable benzo to turn to for an SN attempt. However, if you read what I linked you about propanolol, diazepam has an adverse reaction to it. This means that if you intend to use a beta-blocker, it's going to suppress the effects of your Valium. 5 mg is considered a "light" dose by the way. Without a beta blocker, my recommendation would be 20-40 mg. Also yes, it takes up to 40 minutes to hit the peak, and so your anecdotal experience of 30 minutes is in line with what the Psychonaut Wiki has journaled. In your case, you might consider taking 20+ mg of Valium for an SN attempt.

I apologize, but I don't intend to answer any further questions you have. I'm not here to help you kill yourself, nor is that the point of this forum. Please read the sources I'm citing to you. Thank you.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Hypocrite_ and NeverHis
T

TBONTB

Paragon
May 31, 2025
998
I had noted the difference between you report of two events, both of which seemed painful. Around the same time another member posted chronicles of two people they had been in a chat with. Both were reported without pain.

So why the difference? Of course there are individual differences, but one thing I'm thinking about is the difference between a chat and an audio call. Once a member stops chatting we presume they are unconscious but we really don't have insight into what's happening with them

Food for thought. And thank you for sharing your experience
 
  • Like
Reactions: knivesandcuddles
knivesandcuddles

knivesandcuddles

Member
May 7, 2025
29
I had noted the difference between you report of two events, both of which seemed painful. Around the same time another member posted chronicles of two people they had been in a chat with. Both were reported without pain.

So why the difference?
Yes, as you suspect, it's likely because of it being written messages vs on a call. Since SN can kick in and make someone's communication indecipherable in as little as 4 minutes (as was the case with shroomia), that could very well account for not hearing of any pain from those who were relying on text communication. They likely weren't in a conscious enough state to type it.

Another factor is of course the timing, as I wrote. Again, this thread isn't to dissuade people from SN. It's about how fast it kicks in, and whether the other drugs are sufficiently prepared to counteract the more painful symptoms in time.
 
T

TBONTB

Paragon
May 31, 2025
998
Yes, as you suspect, it's likely because of it being written messages vs on a call. Since SN can kick in and make someone's communication indecipherable in as little as 4 minutes (as was the case with shroomia), that could very well account for not hearing of any pain from those who were relying on text communication. They likely weren't in a conscious enough state to type it.

Another factor is of course the timing, as I wrote. Again, this thread isn't to dissuade people from SN. It's about how fast it kicks in, and whether the other drugs are sufficiently prepared to counteract the more painful symptoms in time.
Ah, so if you had only been chatting with shroomia you would not have any indication of discomfort.

And yes, understand you are simply reporting what you know. That is appreciated..

Take care of yourself.
 
  • Hugs
Reactions: knivesandcuddles
Dante_

Dante_

Global Mod | No future
Feb 27, 2025
334
Lastly, all of this isn't to try to scare people away from SN. Rather, if SN is part of your plan, please consider when you take your supplementary drugs. SN is fast. If the other drugs aren't already kicking in, the SN might be quicker, and such a death might end up more painful than most would anticipate.
A very good point but id like to caution for anyone else that may come across this thread to not use it as an opportunity ask for recommendations or adjustments to timing the meds to align with the process itself.
 
  • Like
Reactions: knivesandcuddles
unluckysadness

unluckysadness

Warlock
Jul 9, 2025
704
I'm sorry, but you're looking in the wrong places. Your answer is already incorrect. LLMs are nothing but statistical models that predict the next word in a sentence. They are not intelligent, and you should never trust any answer they write you. Please. Please listen to me - I have a Master degree in Computer Science and I specialized in this field. LLM-based AIs are not your friend. Please. I beg you.


Valium (diazepam) is a reasonable benzo to turn to for an SN attempt. However, if you read what I linked you about propanolol, diazepam has an adverse reaction to it. This means that if you intend to use a beta-blocker, it's going to suppress the effects of your Valium. 5 mg is considered a "light" dose by the way. Without a beta blocker, my recommendation would be 20-40 mg. Also yes, it takes up to 40 minutes to hit the peak, and so your anecdotal experience of 30 minutes is in line with what the Psychonaut Wiki has journaled. In your case, you might consider taking 20+ mg of Valium for an SN attempt.

I apologize, but I don't intend to answer any further questions you have. I'm not here to help you kill yourself, nor is that the point of this forum. Please read the sources I'm citing to you. Thank you.
I understand. I don't want to help other people to ctb neither. I won't bother you again with questions. Many thanks for your warning. I hope you'll find peace too 🕊️ and sorry again for your loss
 
  • Love
Reactions: knivesandcuddles
homeboundcripple

homeboundcripple

Wanderer
Jun 6, 2025
185
This year, I've personally lost two beings who were very close to me, via sodium nitrite. @spark, a very close friend of mine, died 2025-06-26. @shroomia, my girlfriend (and more practically speaking, my wife) died 2025-10-10.

I'm starting this thread partly to share my anecdotes about their SN deaths + hypoxia in general, but also to discuss possible inaccuracies many might assume about SN as a suicide method. I think it's important that we understand what we're getting into, and whether we can expect peacefulness, since that's what many on here are hoping for.



spark:
spark (it/its pronouns, 19 years old) died by SN on June 26, 2025. spark didn't have any of the other drugs that are typically recommended with an SN regiment: anti-emetics, benzodiazepines, beta-blockers...

No, spark "rawdogged" it with nothing but weed. spark asked shroomia to call with it so it wouldn't have to be alone when it died. According to accounts of shroomia, both on SaSu and more privately in person between the two of us, spark's death was unfortunately...rather painful. spark complained of the nausea and pain to shroomia, even waking back up after losing consciousness, and continuing to be in pain.

In the end, the SN worked, and it took perhaps ~1 hour at most, though shroomia didn't keep track of it. spark...reached out to shroomia while she was at work. shroomia took that call while she was at work from a bathroom stall...



shroomia:
shroomia (she/her or it/its pronouns, 24 years old) died by SN on October 10, 2025. shroomia did have all of the drugs that are recommended for an SN regiment.

I painstakingly took notes of what she told me that night, and you can read the minute-to-minute details in her SaSu thread. However, shroomia too experienced pain while dying from SN. She took her SN around 01:10, and was already unresponsive by 01:22, just 12 minutes later. In the January 2025 PPeH (page 122 of 225), Exit International discusses that 12 minutes is actually rather typical for losing consciousness:
View attachment 182086
The things I heard on call with my girlfriend are more or less exactly what is reported. This is the good news. SN works. Period.

However, it leaves open a rather unsettling fact: SN is quite unforgiving as a method of suicide. shroomia had already taken several tablets of benzos as well as an anti-emetic prior to the SN at 01:10, and yet...she told me about her stomach hurting, and I could hear things like vomiting over the call.



spark and I:
spark and I attempted to CTB with carbon monoxide (CO) on 2025-05-14 (May 14, 2025). That attempt didn't work out, and the both of us suffered symptoms of hypoxia because we both survived.

For me, because I didn't have any sedatives when we brought our burning coals into the room, I ended up waking up after initially losing consciousness. I was in immense pain. I had a headache, severe nausea, and I could barely stand. I left the room and made it to the bathroom, where I found my underwear was already wet from urine, and I also had to clean up quite a bit of feces that had already left my body while I was unconscious. I later learned that all of my remaining headmates had died in that attempt. The brain damage was already that bad.

In the days and weeks that followed, the headache remained for several days. I also developed a cough with flu-like symptoms, which is apparently also common of hypoxia induced by CO poisoning. Those flu-like symptoms stayed around for 1-2 weeks.

In the PPeH (page 175 of 225), Exit International reports their findings of CO deaths:
View attachment 182087
The time that passed between starting our CO attempt and ending it was anywhere between 30 minutes to 2 hours. We didn't keep track very well. I was in a lot of pain, after all. However, with the symptoms I had, I find it surprising that either of us survived at all. It leaves me questioning what went wrong - if we didn't stay in the room long enough, or if the CO concentration dropped too rapidly because of spark spreading out the coals onto grilling trays for surface area, or if the table from the PPeH is misleading and inaccurate.



On the Peacefulness of Nitrites:
Since both CO and SN are known to induce hypoxia (and likely also potassium nitrite - KNO2, aka KN), I've reached some personal beliefs about these methods that I hope can help inform others about the consequences.

Hypoxia sucks. I've lived it. And both spark and shroomia died in discomfort (and yes, even pain) from it. There are some good and bad takeaways from this that we should disillusion ourselves of...

The good:
  • SN works. Period.
  • SN gives a relatively fast death, and leads to rapid unconsciousness.
The neutral:
  • SN requires a fair bit of other drugs to ensure that it's a peaceful way of dying at all.
  • Some of those drugs can be several times more expensive than the SN itself.
  • In several countries, first responders are increasingly carrying around the antidote to SN, "methylene blue." (Source: PPeH, page 120 of 225)
The bad:
  • SN is so rapid that it has become clear to me that the timing of other prior drugs is crucial to the peacefulness of the method.
  • Without already being in a state of heavy drowsiness, the onset of hypoxia symptoms can also be just as rapid and it might lead to an uncomfortable or even painful death.
Worthy of noting (and possible exceptions):
  • Both spark and shroomia were relatively young when they died. Age and other physical traits can always play a role in what our own bodies experience.



Lastly, all of this isn't to try to scare people away from SN. Rather, if SN is part of your plan, please consider when you take your supplementary drugs. SN is fast. If the other drugs aren't already kicking in, the SN might be quicker, and such a death might end up more painful than most would anticipate.

If you're not already familiar with the resource, you should look into the Psychonaut Wiki. It's a wiki of information on drugs and their effects. While most of it is recreational-use information, the site also documents what to expect from benzodiazepines, such as alprazolam (aka Xanax), and when the effects peak.

That's all. Thanks for reading.
Hello, can I ask how much charcoal did you bring into the room and what size was that room? Thanks
 
E

Endisclose

Experienced
Oct 23, 2023
297
Thanks OP for sharing all of this with us. I can't imagine the level of pain you're going through having gone through the experience you've shared with us. I want to let you know that all of us in this community stand with you and are here for you.

One or two things struck me about what you had written about Shroomia's regime prior to CTB. At one point you said she took a few domperidones just prior to CTB while in Shroomia's goodbye thread I believe you mention a 36 hour regime of domperidone taken every by 8 hours.

I think it's worth noting here that meto is probably the strongest antiemetic for this. Not sure if Shroomia had access to it though or if she chose not to take it. In my research, the stat dose leaves more meto in the system compared to the 48 hour regime. I think this is the best option against vomiting.

It is also not clear if she took any PPIs, H2 blockers or antacids. I think the stomach pain may be the result of the SN reacting with the acid in the stomach. The reaction may look somewhat like this..

NaNO2 + HCl ----> HNO2 +NaCl

HNO2 (nitrous acid) is unstable especially in warm acidic conditions like the stomach and decomposes as follows:-

2 HNO2 ----> NO + NO2 + H2O

NO (nitric oxide) and NO2(nitrogen dioxide) are toxic and irritant gases. NO2 is a corrosive brown gas that can irritate the stomach lining and trigger nausea or vomiting due to local chemical irritation.

HNO2 formation is strongly pH-dependent. If the gastric pH is raised, protonation of NO2- to HNO2 is suppressed, so fewer nitrosating/irritant species are formed.

In other words the solution seems to be to lower stomach acid (raising the pH and making it less acidic) either through PPIs or H2 blockers or antacids or a combination of all of them.

I think the older PPeH versions used to recommend PPIs, H2 blockers, antacids but then the newer versions seem to have dropped them - not sure why. The newer version just says rather cryptically "The benefit in terms of potentiation...cannot be clearly established. This is not longer advised."

But who is talking about the need for potentiation which is the effect of enhancing the efficacy (or potency) of a drug. SN is pretty potent at the recommended dose in and by itself. You don't need anything to "potentiate" or enhance that. The moot question is if it would reduce discomfort or possible pain.

There is no indication that lowering stomach acid would affect nitrite absorption in any significant way. In fact it might lead to enhanced nitrite absorption in the small intestine as lesser nitrite is converted into the gaseous form of NO and NO2.

PPIs seem to be the most efficient way to do this, but need to be taken over at least 4 to 5 days to achieve good enough acid suppression. Just taking a stat dose before CTB might not be of much use in this regard. These need time to have their effect. People with acid reflux issues are usually prescribed a course of 4 to 8 weeks to achieve maximal acid suppression, but as per my research about 4 to 5 days or maybe a week should be sufficient.

A section of the PPeH under the chapter "Supplementary drugs" recommends 40 mg of nexium daily about 30 to 60 mins before breakfast and 800 mg of cimetidine 30 to 60 mins before dinner at night daily. They need to be taken apart as the PPI needs acidic activation, so taking an H2 blocker at the same time or shortly before may blunt the PPIs activation (since there's not enough acid to activate it).

PPIs work over a longer time period but can deliver greater overall acid suppression close to 98% and have a more durable effect (24 to 48 hours). Cimetidine is faster acting but achieves only about 60 to 70% of acid suppression and its effect is less durable than that of PPIs (4 to 8 hours).

Antacids are extremely short term and are used to neutralize the existing stomach acid alone. So it makes sense for them to be taken just about 45 mins prior to CTB. Their effect lasts only about 30 to 60 mins.
 
Last edited:
Alexandra_

Alexandra_

Don't Fear the Reaper
Sep 30, 2023
707
Thank you for sharing this information. I'm sorry you had to go through this, and I hope you're feeling better now. May your friends rest in peace, may their memory be eternal
 
Hiro Uchiha

Hiro Uchiha

Experienced
Oct 7, 2025
207
I followed your previous thread on shroomia. I hope you are able to cope somehow with this loss. I'm particularly sad that they reported pain during their last moments, knowing that I myself cling to the idea of SN being relatively painless. Did they have the same source/batch of SN?
 
madameviolette

madameviolette

Made sick by medical institutions
Oct 9, 2025
29
I watched a video of a guy who CTB with SN and it sure scared me. It took quite a long time and he was foaming and trying to reach with his arms
Also OP could we have physical description of both members ? It seems lightweight people take much longer to die than heavier ones ?
 
Last edited:
Hiro Uchiha

Hiro Uchiha

Experienced
Oct 7, 2025
207
It seems lightweight people take much longer to die than heavier ones ?
Interesting. May I know how you came to this speculation?
Personally, I would think it's the other way around.

Lethal Dose 50 is a measure of toxicity and LD50 value is directly related to body weight, as it is typically expressed in milligrams of a substance per kilogram of body weight (mg/kg).

Relatig this to SN's mechanism inside the body; bodyweight is generally proportional to blood volume, but it may vary depending on how lean you are. SN fatality depends on the dose, it determines methemoglobin levels. The higher the blood volume, the longer it takes to reach fatal methemoglobin levels so heavier people in theory should require higher dose and take more time to succumb.

Sidenote: (LD50) of sodium nitrite varies slightly across studies but is consistently reported in the range of 150 to 216 mg/kg. PPeH recommends 25g if bodyweight is below 100kg and 30g if above.
 
madameviolette

madameviolette

Made sick by medical institutions
Oct 9, 2025
29
Interesting. May I know how you came to this speculation?
Personally, I would think it's the other way around.

Lethal Dose 50 is a measure of toxicity and LD50 value is directly related to body weight, as it is typically expressed in milligrams of a substance per kilogram of body weight (mg/kg).

Relatig this to SN's mechanism inside the body; bodyweight is generally proportional to blood volume, but it may vary depending on how lean you are. SN fatality depends on the dose, it determines methemoglobin levels. The higher the blood volume, the longer it takes to reach fatal methemoglobin levels so heavier people in theory should require higher dose and take more time to succumb.

Sidenote: (LD50) of sodium nitrite varies slightly across studies but is consistently reported in the range of 150 to 216 mg/kg. PPeH recommends 25g if bodyweight is below 100kg and 30g if above.
This is from my observation and also what other members have reported. I also thought lighter people die faster because well it seems logical given lethality and dosage but it seems to be the opposite from what I gathered. Maybe it has to do with the ability to digest ?
It seems there are so many variables to how people process drugs, People with previous drug abuse might have higher tolerance for other substances. It also depends on gut health, gastric emptying, immune system, cardiovascular health. So much metrics that play in whether it could be peaceful or not.
 
Last edited:
TransTaxEvader

TransTaxEvader

I miss you so badly Sienna.
Feb 22, 2025
263
hi, if it helps improve accuracy, my best friend @StrugglingSienna took 19 minutes to fall unconscious after ingesting SN. She had all the medications though. No reports of pain, just fading consciousness and a warm feeling.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Hiro Uchiha

Similar threads

ImpairedLowlife
Replies
31
Views
2K
Suicide Discussion
unluckysadness
unluckysadness
O
Replies
4
Views
346
Suicide Discussion
Hiro Uchiha
Hiro Uchiha
Michelstaedter
Replies
0
Views
157
Suicide Discussion
Michelstaedter
Michelstaedter
J
Replies
35
Views
6K
Suicide Discussion
notreallybored
N