Okay... well, "Most logically thinking people don't want minors here" is a very indirect way of answering, but I suppose I'll take it. We're not in a courtroom I suppose, lol. I suppose I like direct answers too much for my own good.
Are you/were you of the belief that, just because someone is on a "suicide forum", that they aren
logically thinking?
Okay, I agree with that. I'm more asking though why SS is doing that even if they don't legally have to.
I'll further clarify one of my responses by saying that I'm by no means aware of ALL US laws pertaining to the Internet, so I really don't know. That question would be better directed towards the website administration.
Oh, sorry, I didn't look at your post history, but I believe you. Interesting point about the age of 25 thing. So you think this community should instead ask people if they're below 25?
I didn't say that. I don't have all the answers, nor do I claim to.
Tamer than the Wild West? Yes, I do.
Wow. There are indiscriminate shootings every day in cities like Philly, Chicago, NY, Baltimore, etc. The US has the highest level of gun deaths of any Western society (please don't get into the 2nd Amendment arguments, of which I am a staunch supporter). I fail to see how society is any "tamer" than it once was. Rapes are occurring at astonishing rates. Drug abuse is rampant. We may have more laws on the books now, but the thing about laws is that there isn't one iotta of proof that they change any human behavior. The only thing they do, can do, is deal with a crime
after the fact.
I think it's a poor case to make against trying to find a better way to prevent a minor from registering to this forum.
The ONLY way is to require ID of some sort. Sometimes answers to dilemmas are binary. In this case, one is either anonymous, or they're not. There is no "pseudo-anonymous" choice. I think if you have a problem with US law, you should reach out to the lawmakers and have the change made there.
I don't take it the wrong way. All good. Also, I believe this forum doesn't seem to care much about a minor accessing this site, which is why I'm asking the questions to see what kind of responses I get to either prove me wrong or get me to understand why there is so little care (I could imagine people are preoccupied with their own lives and don't have the energy or even means of doing something about; I suppose that's where I am; but then again, I haven't gotten that kind of response, but rather replies that don't really answer or excuses for why minors will inevitably access this site, have a chance at killing themselves, and nothing being done about it).
Again, the ONLY way to ensure minors don't have access to this site is to require ID of some sort, and it would be impossible to have an anonymous forum and require ID from registrants at the same time. You know, the "gun store" sites, in order to keep minors off their sites, now have an "entrance" requirement that is merely a "click" to attest that you are of legal age to view the website. In essence, an honor system. Why not go after them for "not doing more"? And, speaking of getting "non answers", I see that the idea I put forth originally about you being a reporter, which I do think you are btw, wasn't at all addressed in your response. The way I see it, you're either a reporter attempting to gather juicy tidbits to further your agenda of trying to get this site shutdown, or an aggrieved parent who lost their minor child to suicide and who blames this website for helping them to do so, even though the child's struggles were present LONG before they made it to this website.
I find it a bit funny that you believe there isn't a single minor registered to this forum. Even if I don't have empirical personal evidence of it, it doesn't take that to know that since it does happen, that it has happened again. Not every minor is going to out themselves.
It shouldn't be a question of what I believe, or what you believe, for that matter. Belief is not proof. If you have knowledge of a minor(s) on this site, you should report it to a mod, and it will be investigated and dealt with. I, myself, have reported suspected minors when information surfaced that made me believe they were minors, and the powers-that-be quickly took action. So, in essence, there are actions taken to keep minors off this site. I'd go so far as to say that's what ANY other site that doesn't allow minors does to police their userbase. Why should this site have different requirements?
Actually, though, throwing around accusations without proof of some sort could be considered libelous, so I'd be careful in that regard. That's not a threat. I don't have those kinds of powers. I'm just a user. But, there is plenty of precedent of companies, in this case a website, successfully suing, and winning, damage awards due to libelous claims made against them. Just saying.