OceanBlue
Feminist
- Jun 13, 2021
- 701
This is also so misguided.. you think people can be happy and safe in a world like ours? When continuing to live can result in so many different disasters? We should be happy and relieved that a loved one will never suffer again, if you actually need explanations - you don't understand the world enough.I just wanted him to be happy and safe. I thought he was, finally. He was buying things, got a nice car
Should help the OP to rethink pro-living conditioning, that people can't be "happy and safe" living in hell and should not be expecting generic notes 'without accusations' from people they weren't close enough with. As we live in literal hell, what kind of explanations can we possibly demand from people? If we have enough awareness, we'll understand WHY without notes, if not - the notes will not help and those who CTB shouldn't be pressured into leaving them, like here. This person wrote enough for me to understand this much.Seriously! Do you really think this helps the OP?
You're making assumptions and accusations in a case you know nothing about.
Did ever thought about people can have multiple reasons to not leave a note? Even if they're close?
Edit: I think I figured out why it bugged so much. It's Sharon adjacent behaviour:
1. was not close enough for the person to confide in
2. has pro-living conditioning, "safe and happy" rhetoric, have not weighed the risks of pro-living option
3. centers themself, their own grief
4. becomes hysterical after fact, bothers the authorities or forums.
5. wants generic explanations for closure, without accusations - lack of accountability
It's definitely much better than actual Sharonism as they weren't the one who created them in the first place, but still very similar.
Last edited: