
TAW122
Emissary of the right to die.
- Aug 30, 2018
- 6,956
I get this compliment from time to time, "You're a really Intelligent person" from people IRL and while most of the time it is benign, it sometimes can be insulting. It depends on the tone of voice and context in which the person uses the phrase. As someone with Aspergers and a bit above average IQ compared to the general population, I find it unfair and more burdensome that my bad social skills and people skills really make my life difficult and sucky, but yet because of my intellect, people have this unrealistic expectation that I would be ok, functioning, and successful in life (according to societal standards), which is far, far from the truth. It is ignorant and unreasonable to put the onus and burden of responsibility for those with Aspergers and/or autism to just be able to be like "other people" or to "get it".
More oftenly than not, I don't just "get it" when it comes to social norms, body language, conversation flow, and all other things. Even assuming that I could learn it, at best, because of the condition and how my mind works, I would just be mimicking and memorizing patterns rather than understanding things responding well, similar to how most non-autistic people (NT - Neurotypicals) behave and act. The other downside to that is that if/should something change, adapting and responding to the change effective, in a timely manner is just not something that happens with autistic people, that would break me very quickly. It would be a neverending, exhausting, constant battle of learning and relearning patterns (too taxing and tiring). Most NT's and non-autistic people don't have that problem at least not to the extent of most people on the spectrum. Sure, they have new things they have to learn and keep up, but it comes easier for them overall.
Sometimes, I wished I'd have less IQ points, like 10-15 (15 might be a bit too much but at least 10) if it meant that I am non-autistic and maybe less intelligent. At least that would make my social life more bearable, easier to "get social norms" and understand people better, get along better, and just generally function a bit better. Having a lot of intelligence is useless if one cannot harness that intelligence to do significant things (inventing some new tool, getting a Ph. D, winning a nobel prize, etc.) and has more harm and disadvantages than advantages. Sure, I may be better than other people in things that don't really matter as much (philosophy, reasoning, logic, and shit like that), but that wouldn't help me much in the real world, day to day life, interactions with people which all make up the vast majority of life itself.
More oftenly than not, I don't just "get it" when it comes to social norms, body language, conversation flow, and all other things. Even assuming that I could learn it, at best, because of the condition and how my mind works, I would just be mimicking and memorizing patterns rather than understanding things responding well, similar to how most non-autistic people (NT - Neurotypicals) behave and act. The other downside to that is that if/should something change, adapting and responding to the change effective, in a timely manner is just not something that happens with autistic people, that would break me very quickly. It would be a neverending, exhausting, constant battle of learning and relearning patterns (too taxing and tiring). Most NT's and non-autistic people don't have that problem at least not to the extent of most people on the spectrum. Sure, they have new things they have to learn and keep up, but it comes easier for them overall.
Sometimes, I wished I'd have less IQ points, like 10-15 (15 might be a bit too much but at least 10) if it meant that I am non-autistic and maybe less intelligent. At least that would make my social life more bearable, easier to "get social norms" and understand people better, get along better, and just generally function a bit better. Having a lot of intelligence is useless if one cannot harness that intelligence to do significant things (inventing some new tool, getting a Ph. D, winning a nobel prize, etc.) and has more harm and disadvantages than advantages. Sure, I may be better than other people in things that don't really matter as much (philosophy, reasoning, logic, and shit like that), but that wouldn't help me much in the real world, day to day life, interactions with people which all make up the vast majority of life itself.
Last edited: