
JuliaOnTheNet
pew pew pew
- Feb 14, 2023
- 101
I'm kinda glad he made the video, without it I'd have never found this Site. I would have never found it on google and I'm so glad to be here
Today, OFCOM launched an official investigation into Sanctioned Suicide under the UK’s Online Safety Act. This has already made headlines across the UK.
This is a clear and unprecedented overreach by a foreign regulator against a U.S.-based platform. We reject this interference and will be defending the site’s existence and mission.
In addition to our public response, we are currently seeking legal representation to ensure the best possible defense in this matter. If you are a lawyer or know of one who may be able to assist, please contact us at [email protected].
Read our statement here:
Donate via cryptocurrency:
how would that membership work, i'm curiousIt's unclear to me how requiring members to register to view the forum pages would invade privacy, unless I am misinterpreting your point?
These are all very good points. But my point is that if our content was behind some wall, we could at least say that the site is making efforts to shield the information from minors. Obviously they can get it elsewhere, but SS can't be held accountable for that. We can be held accountable for what we do.
We must admit that there is a disconnect. We technically do not allow minors on the site and everyone has to vow that they are of the age of majority. So the question is, why does that requirement exist. Is it because we don't think minors should be engaging with this content? (That is admittedly an assumption, but I think a fair one.) If that's the case, then the content should at least be behind a membership wall where minors can't access it. That's not a big leap to make.
Of course that's not going to solve the problem. Minors will probably still find a way to join as they have in the past, or they can get the information elsewhere. But I don't think the argument that we can't stop something entirely means that we shouldn't do anything.
I also think there are benefits in the optics of having the method information behind a membership wall. Again, it's not a perfect solution, but it would eliminate at least one of the arguments against the site. I reiterate that I've always been uneasy with this, because that info was invaluable to me long before I joined SS. It saved me from attempting a method that could have been unreliable in my case and would have led to serious complications. So again, it's a benefit vs. risk assessment here.
And the other reason I support membership is just to protect us all. I worry about Fixers and others having such easy access to members' posts. Again, I know membership doesn't completely solve this, as anyone can join, but at least it would give admins and mods some control and options.
Please don't mistake my comments as representative of my views on age restrictions for suicide. I was simply commenting on the disconnect between the site's age requirement for membership vs. the access of information on the site for minors. And even on that front, I think there've been many point brought up since my initial post that present some valid reasons for not restricting access. I just think it's always worth assessing how policies and practices relate to your mission and philosophy.how would that membership work, i'm curious
and there research to prove that people around the age of 16 have finished their cognitive developement to make their decision to ctb: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6551607/
while teenagers might be more prone to emotional coersion, i don't think they should be entirely denied the right to die, but go through a screening process to determine if they're under strong emotional influence
Thanks man! I Appreciate the responsePlease don't mistake my comments as representative of my views on age restrictions for suicide. I was simply commenting on the disconnect between the site's age requirement for membership vs. the access of information on the site for minors. And even on that front, I think there've been many point brought up since my initial post that present some valid reasons for not restricting access. I just think it's always worth assessing how policies and practices relate to your mission and philosophy.
I think we gotta talk about children accessing a suicide forum, regardless of the performative shock and Overton window of the NPCsIs it because we don't think minors should be engaging with this content? (That is admittedly an assumption, but I think a fair one.) If that's the case, then the content should at least be behind a membership wall where minors can't access it. That's not a big leap to make.
... I reiterate that I've always been uneasy with this, because that info was invaluable to me long before I joined SS. It saved me from attempting a method that could have been unreliable in my case and would have led to serious complications. So again, it's a benefit vs. risk assessment here.
Idk I've seen the opposite. People pointing out that it's never too late to back out and seek help, even in the midst of an attempt to CTB. Reassuring people that they're not cowards for backing out when it wasn't their time to go. I've seen people find hope and recover here. I'm a woman and I've never seen any sexual harassment here. I disagree with the concept of "dangerous" in the sense of being open and honest about methods. People here already want/have methods in mind, and having information about them may dissuade people from choosing options that have a high risk of permanent but not fatal damage. I believe that's a good thing.I might get critiqued here, but I actually don't have a huge issue with his video
I think he does bring up some valid points, some of which being about how being on SS can can dehabilitatig to people who are already suffering. Everyones reasons for being on this site are unique, though its combination of abuse, trauma, mental illness, so on and so forth. Having suicide as an option and that is accessible though discussing methods so readily can be dangerous
And while this site is "pro choice" I often find it to be "pro suicide". Even people who post successes about their recovery or how they've come to enjoy life are subtly outed as being a "pro lifer". If a person recovers and does better, that's amazing in my book and that should be seen as inspiration. Where as people who go through with death are put up in a pedestal
It's easy to idolize death here and that makes it worse
In the video he also mentioned a section about the creators being incels and how unsafe the site is for women. And as someone who has experienced forms of sexual harassment here, I do agree
This isn't me bashing SS (heck I am here everyday and have come back multiple times) but also continue to do therapy and other forms of recovery. My feelings change on and off and I just wanted to give my 2 cents
I expect to be called names or whatever and shamed. But I just wanted to speak out. Whatever comes out of this, well, I'll deal with it as I see fit
He cherry picked a few posts. His video is bias and misrepresents the site. Not only that, he used clickbait. No one says "Do it". How could you not have a huge issue with the video?I might get critiqued here, but I actually don't have a huge issue with his video
I think he does bring up some valid points, some of which being about how being on SS can can dehabilitatig to people who are already suffering. Everyones reasons for being on this site are unique, though its combination of abuse, trauma, mental illness, so on and so forth. Having suicide as an option and that is accessible though discussing methods so readily can be dangerous
And while this site is "pro choice" I often find it to be "pro suicide". Even people who post successes about their recovery or how they've come to enjoy life are subtly outed as being a "pro lifer". If a person recovers and does better, that's amazing in my book and that should be seen as inspiration. Where as people who go through with death are put up in a pedestal
It's easy to idolize death here and that makes it worse
In the video he also mentioned a section about the creators being incels and how unsafe the site is for women. And as someone who has experienced forms of sexual harassment here, I do agree
This isn't me bashing SS (heck I am here everyday and have come back multiple times) but also continue to do therapy and other forms of recovery. My feelings change on and off and I just wanted to give my 2 cents
I expect to be called names or whatever and shamed. But I just wanted to speak out. Whatever comes out of this, well, I'll deal with it as I see fit
He really showed his true colours saying something like that, so untrue as well. How horrible to blame the people of this site who are struggling just like the guy he's talking about (who he didn't even hardly know or care about before). This site was pretty hard to find, I was googling methods, I never would've known about it otherwise. I felt better after having found this place, and LESS likely to CTB. He goes and makes a video and targets the very people who would never have found this site before and will just come here from morbid curiosity. Tell someone about the most "toxic" place on the web, people will come here just to see if he's right (he's not). Great job man! If the site really was as bad as you say, you've just gone and driven lots of people straight here. Lucky for him, it's not toxic, people are not mean and make you feel worthless here (like they might on twitter etc.) and no one is gonna brainwash anyone into CTB. He was also on this site for a little while too, so was our hero on any of the goodbye threads personally saving people like he expects everyone else to?i got freaked too. i kept refreshing constantly, getting scared i got targeted…
i dislike his "u got a minor killed" thing. i attempted twice in my teens and had no clue this website even existed. it's almost as if…suicidal people will be suicidal no matter where tf they spend time online. peer support and community support is so important, more important than a traumatizing psych ward will ever be. this website is how some of us access that.
I definitely agree that young people need a space for this. As someone who has taught Grade 3 through college, I'm familiar with a lot of the challenges faced by young people of all ages. But it's really tricky legal ground. I can certainly understand why it's easier for the site to have an age requirement.I don't know if this site is best for them, but they need SOME safe place to talk and realize they needn't be alone. Protected from predators. This site isn't just about death; it's the reason I'm still alive. Normies fundamentally misunderstand this place. People come here to discuss the things they Can't Say in polite disney-cult society
Firstly, I'm really sorry you've experienced sexual harassment on this site. That makes me quite sad to read. As it's most basic requirement, this site should be a safe space. I hope the situation was dealt with accordingly.I might get critiqued here, but I actually don't have a huge issue with his video
I think he does bring up some valid points, some of which being about how being on SS can can dehabilitatig to people who are already suffering. Everyones reasons for being on this site are unique, though its combination of abuse, trauma, mental illness, so on and so forth. Having suicide as an option and that is accessible though discussing methods so readily can be dangerous
And while this site is "pro choice" I often find it to be "pro suicide". Even people who post successes about their recovery or how they've come to enjoy life are subtly outed as being a "pro lifer". If a person recovers and does better, that's amazing in my book and that should be seen as inspiration. Where as people who go through with death are put up in a pedestal
It's easy to idolize death here and that makes it worse
In the video he also mentioned a section about the creators being incels and how unsafe the site is for women. And as someone who has experienced forms of sexual harassment here, I do agree
I've made this response on another thread tackling the topic, i though it fits here!!it doesn't really strike you as you of character for the type of content he makes, he actually nailed his own formula, this video gained the most views he has gotten from a video since 4 years, and it's only been around in one month.
while i can't really say what his intentions are, i'd like to point out that these types of people, the reactionary type, in their persuit of topics to tackles they stumble upon topics that generally pertain misery, that trigger a strong emotional response, and with that and the use of some Fluff and rhetoric, they're able to blame the systemic failures that caused the aformentioned misery to occur in the first place on somethings or someones that are just acting in response to it.
they give people something to react to (and hence the naming: reactionary), somethings that's easy to bite, to take in without jeopardising their hegemonic worldview, they give the common people an enemy to rally against, to feel some kind of reward after they take down the enemy, to feel good, while the systems that caused the "enemy" to emerge in the first place remain intact, which only repeats the cycle again.
P.S: i'll provide examples of how this plays out in bigger media if anyone's interested just reply !
Disclaimer: these are all rhetorical questions since the answers are apparent. I'm not giving you the third degree, but just pointing out the discrepancies in some of the things you've declared.I might get critiqued here, but I actually don't have a huge issue with his video
I think he does bring up some valid points, some of which being about how being on SS can can dehabilitatig to people who are already suffering. Everyones reasons for being on this site are unique, though its combination of abuse, trauma, mental illness, so on and so forth. Having suicide as an option and that is accessible though discussing methods so readily can be dangerous
And while this site is "pro choice" I often find it to be "pro suicide". Even people who post successes about their recovery or how they've come to enjoy life are subtly outed as being a "pro lifer". If a person recovers and does better, that's amazing in my book and that should be seen as inspiration. Where as people who go through with death are put up in a pedestal
It's easy to idolize death here and that makes it worse
In the video he also mentioned a section about the creators being incels and how unsafe the site is for women. And as someone who has experienced forms of sexual harassment here, I do agree
This isn't me bashing SS (heck I am here everyday and have come back multiple times) but also continue to do therapy and other forms of recovery. My feelings change on and off and I just wanted to give my 2 cents
I expect to be called names or whatever and shamed. But I just wanted to speak out. Whatever comes out of this, well, I'll deal with it as I see fit
I haven't been here that long, but I've only seen one post about how this site made someone feel worse. Therefore, how can you assert that being here is debilitating if hardly anyone expresses those sentiments?
Sure, I think this forum would've been beneficial to teenaged me. What does the mainstream have? Alcohol/cigarette ads, powerful religions that offer no solid evidence for astonishing claims, and propaganda agencies like NYT that drumbeat "forever wars."To put it in a nutshell- if you had stumbled on the site aged 12, 14, 16, 18- do you think it would have influenced your thinking early on? Do you think it would have been good for your development, or bad- or would it not have made a difference?
Sure, I think this forum would've been beneficial to teenaged me. What does the mainstream have? Alcohol/cigarette ads, powerful religions that offer no solid evidence for astonishing claims, and propaganda agencies like NYT that drumbeat "forever wars."
We live in a world of deadly cults.
People navigating life need tolerably accurate views of it. Including learning about worst-case life scenarios and non-mainstream ideas. Look at the youtube troll's criteria for being a cult: "First, it has a highly peculiar alternative ideology which runs contrary to mainstream thinking." That conformist fear of non-mainstream thought is not only cultish, but dangerous.
What's the very next cult he cites? Scientology. Yep, a cult. But what's a mainstream counterpart? How about Christianity? With its Holy Wars, who shocked the Roman Empire by flaying the philosopher/mathematician/scientist Hypatia with oyster shells. Recently, Christians tried converting me to "fight for the glory of God."
And why does he cite Scientology? Because they're against "medical professionals and therapists." (Like his family, which makes money off your misery.) Are they cult-like? Yes! Their residencies, where they work over 80 hours a week, are "brutal, like a kind of hazing." (Source, google's cache.) A Yale professor said, "It's almost part of the medical school culture that a faculty member may try to embarrass you or humiliate you."
("Almost" is an understatement.)
Who wants their malnourished doctor working an 80 hour workweek? Who "prayed that they would die so that I wouldn't have to stay up for two more hours"? But their precious hazing rituals are more important than our health.
Here, you'll find alternative viewpoints. And articulate your own. Propagandists shove mainstream ideologies down your throat. So why would it hurt to get more diverse views?
Our youtube troll participates in DDOSing us, to "hamper this site's ability to function." Why do his followers censor us? Because this site counters mainstream cult mentality. Unmediated by professional cultists.
Then he should make a video denouncing the hospital that allowed a 17 year old (same age as the user whose death prompted his ego-driven crusade) in its care to CTB. Or any other facility in which minors or people in general have died (plenty of cases).I very much agree with you. I think his ideas are VERY MUCH influenced by the fact that his parents are healthcare workers. I think it certainly counts for his obvious faith in the system- like seeking help automatically means that 1. you'll receive it and 2. it will actually be effective. From the poll I did yesterday- ok- only 44 votes but out of them, 81% of us ALREADY HAVE sought out and received 'professional' help- clearly it hasn't worked!
Where's the content hidden behind that 100 $ paywall that he mentioned (lol)?Fuck tantacrul. I used to watch his content. What a slimy prick.
This right here, and by now, it's quite obvious that he failed miserably at trying to put a dent into SS -- in fact, he did quite the opposite. Happy that we get to move on from yet another attempt to take down such a helpful site.Tantacrul literally implied that SS exists to make money off people CTBing. He just straight up spread misinformation to make the website look as bad as possible. At this point, I'm over it.